Rendered at 02:39:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
zerolunier 2 days ago [-]
that's something most people ignore, but i don't think they gone fix it because india's govt. is sleeping on these kind of things
BLKNSLVR 2 days ago [-]
Meta likes profit more than it dislikes CSAM.
herbst 2 days ago [-]
People who are using this shit hole of company should be aware that they are part of the problem with every click they do, whenever they message someone on WhatsApp. You are part of the problem
bheadmaster 2 days ago [-]
"People who are using this shit of a drug should be aware that they are part of the problem with every line they do, whenever they fetch a bag of cocaine. You are part of the problem"
herbst 2 days ago [-]
Which is true as well. It doesn't make them bad people or evil human beings. But they are definitely part of the problem yes, hard to deny that.
Also kinda funny how you compare meta with cocaine
bheadmaster 15 hours ago [-]
> Which is true as well
Not quite, as if it was, the War on Drugs would succeed. Instead, it failed spectacularly.
People using Meta products are not making an arbitrary choice that happens to be evil. They are using Meta because other people are using Meta (network effect) or because it helps them calm down after a long day (addiction).
You can say they are "technically part of the problem", as in, their usage supports Meta existence in some micro way, but that doesn't warrant the harsh phrasing you've presented in the original comment.
Punishing addicts doesn't solve the social problem of addiction, in the same way that punishing homeless people doesn't solve the social problem of homelessness.
happymellon 2 days ago [-]
> ...said it found 332 ads featuring CSAM on Instagram and Facebook running in the US, UK, EU, Australia and India.
What has WhatsApp got to do with this? Just because it is Meta?
herbst 1 days ago [-]
Are you suggesting WhatsApp is not part of the same evil company that is happy to spam the world with dangerous and horrible ads?
happymellon 1 days ago [-]
What part of "because it is part of Meta" implies that is not part of Meta?
herbst 1 days ago [-]
Than what do you mean with what does it have to do with it? Isn't that obvious then?
happymellon 1 days ago [-]
That WhatsApp doesn't serve adverts?
I do ask that question.
And no, it's not obvious how a service is bad so if you use a different service then you are just as bad as unrelated people.
herbst 17 hours ago [-]
What are you even arguing about? WhatsApp does serve ads, obviously.
Also kinda funny how you compare meta with cocaine
Not quite, as if it was, the War on Drugs would succeed. Instead, it failed spectacularly.
People using Meta products are not making an arbitrary choice that happens to be evil. They are using Meta because other people are using Meta (network effect) or because it helps them calm down after a long day (addiction).
You can say they are "technically part of the problem", as in, their usage supports Meta existence in some micro way, but that doesn't warrant the harsh phrasing you've presented in the original comment.
Punishing addicts doesn't solve the social problem of addiction, in the same way that punishing homeless people doesn't solve the social problem of homelessness.
What has WhatsApp got to do with this? Just because it is Meta?
I do ask that question.
And no, it's not obvious how a service is bad so if you use a different service then you are just as bad as unrelated people.
https://whatsappbusiness.com/
It talks about having a business WhatsApp number so customers can contact you.